[jamming] is -q gone
matt at lickey.com
Tue Feb 25 07:53:36 PST 2003
Jacob Gorm Hansen <jg at ioi.dk> writes:
> I noticed that in Matt Armstrongs branch of Jam (which I use for the
> header scanning) the -q option was missing. Is this deliberate move,
> or will it reappear later on?
I just noticed that it does not even compile! :-)
If -q is missing, it is not intended. I'll see what I can do to fix
it, but I won't have time to do so any time soon.
More information about the jamming