Defect trackers and Perforce

DavidJeskejeske at home.chat.net DavidJeskejeske at home.chat.net
Wed Jun 10 11:50:23 PDT 1998


On Wed, Jun 10, 1998 at 01:37:38PM -0500, Brad_Appleton-GBDA001 at email.mot.com wrote:
> Richard Geiger writes:
> >    2.1. A wrapper we use around the "p4" command looks at the
> 
> IMHO - Perforce really needs to provide triggers to do this so we don't
> have to possibly create a new interface from the standard command, or
> shove an extra "wrapper path" in front of the perforce path, or be
> quite so easy to circumvent. I heard a rumor once that some triggers
> were added (or were in the works) for p4. Has this actually happened yet?

I hear the current plan is for it to be in 98.3


It would be interesting if they could setup the configuration stuff so
that you would no longer need a wrapper. However, unless they let me add
and organize the p4 commands, I doubt I would stop using a wrapper for
large installations.

- -- 
David Jeske (N9LCA) + http://www.chat.net/~jeske/ + jeske at chat.net





More information about the perforce-user mailing list