[p4] Regd File Deletion(s).
Dave Lewis
dlewis at vignette.com
Fri Jul 6 16:12:47 PDT 2001
you don't want to obliterate deleted files as a general rule because
you will loose the source to old releases.
dave
> From: "Ganesh Kondal" <gkondal at modulant.com>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="us-ascii"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
> Importance: Normal
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700
> Sender: perforce-user-admin at perforce.com
> Errors-To: perforce-user-admin at perforce.com
> X-BeenThere: perforce-user at perforce.com
> X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.4
> Precedence: bulk
> List-Help: <mailto:perforce-user-request at perforce.com?subject=help>
> List-Post: <mailto:perforce-user at perforce.com>
> List-Subscribe: <http://maillist.perforce.com/mailman/listinfo/perforce-user>,
> <mailto:perforce-user-request at perforce.com?subject=subscribe>
> List-Id: Discuss Perforce with other users <perforce-user.perforce.com>
> List-Unsubscribe: <http://maillist.perforce.com/mailman/listinfo/perforce-user>,
> <mailto:perforce-user-request at perforce.com?subject=unsubscribe>
> List-Archive: <http://maillist.perforce.com/pipermail/perforce-user/>
> Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 15:09:35 -0700
>
> Hi All,
>
> I understand that perforce wont remove the files just by making "p4
> delete". It needs p4 obliterate -y .. to take out the whole revision tree.
>
> Qn:
> What is the normal procedure followed in case of deletion. Its very
> possible that the users deleting the files then & there - b'coz of the move
> or renaming or etc.. (assuming most of them needs to removed as a whole -
> including its revisions).
>
> Is it the developers are asked to send a note to the p4 admin?
> Is this hidden (deleted) files will be a problem as the database grows
> large ?
> Usually how they are tracked ?
>
> Is there any super user command to look for all the files present in the
> depot eventhough its last/latest revision is deleted - so at any point super
> user will have the ability to identify files that are not getting used for a
> longer period of time..-to erase.
>
> It will be helpful if you could share your experience in this aspect...
>
> Thanks,
> Ganesh
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: perforce-user-admin at perforce.com
> [mailto:perforce-user-admin at perforce.com]On Behalf Of Stephen Vance
> Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 10:06 AM
> To: Jason Trenouth; perforce-user at perforce.com
> Subject: Re: [p4] 2001.1 server and 2000.2 clients ?
>
>
> I'd check the release notes for counterindications, but usually older
> clients will work with newer servers, except they don't have access to any
> new features. Perforce has been very good about that.
>
> Steve
>
> At 02:59 PM 7/5/2001 +0100, Jason Trenouth wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >Can we use the old 2000.2 clients (mac os x) with the new 2001.1 server
> >(windows 2k)?
> >
> >__Jason
> >_______________________________________________
> >perforce-user mailing list - perforce-user at perforce.com
> >http://maillist.perforce.com/mailman/listinfo/perforce-user
>
> Stephen Vance
> mailto:steve at vance.com
> http://www.vance.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> perforce-user mailing list - perforce-user at perforce.com
> http://maillist.perforce.com/mailman/listinfo/perforce-user
>
> _______________________________________________
> perforce-user mailing list - perforce-user at perforce.com
> http://maillist.perforce.com/mailman/listinfo/perforce-user
>
More information about the perforce-user
mailing list