[p4] Reasons not to allow adding junk files to Perforce

Todd Short tshort at cisco.com
Fri Jun 18 11:23:39 PDT 2004

Anything needed to reproduce the software should be under source control.
Especially if they change over time, and/or are modified by multiple people.
This includes, source code, tools (yes I wanted to put my compiler under
source control), requirement, functional and design specifications.
Things like job descriptions and time sheets don't fall into this category.
They are typically created by a single person, and while they change over
time, they represent work during a week. It's not as though when you submit
a new time sheet that you are modifying an old timesheet from last week, you
are creating a new record/document.
Test plans and results should be in a dedicated system that can track
results over a number of releases and builds.
-Todd Short 
// tshort at cisco.com 
// "One if by land, two if by sea, three if by the Internet." 

-----Original Message-----
From: perforce-user-admin at perforce.com
[mailto:perforce-user-admin at perforce.com] On Behalf Of HB. Nguyen
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 1:22 PM
To: perforce-user at perforce.com
Subject: [p4] Reasons not to allow adding junk files to Perforce

Hi all,
Our management people are adding lots of stuffs that are not "Source Codes"
into Perforce (ex: job descriptions, time sheets ... ). 
Please give me 3 reasons to convince them not to add it to Perforce.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.perforce.com/pipermail/perforce-user/attachments/20040618/80f80bb9/attachment-0008.html>

More information about the perforce-user mailing list