[p4] Very big Perforce file : db.have

Robert Cowham robert at vaccaperna.co.uk
Thu Aug 10 01:51:30 PDT 2006


> For best performance, it is a 
> good thing if you have enough memory in your server that 
> db.have can be held entirely in memory.

I would qualify this by saying that it is good to have enough memory to hold
the *active* part of db.have - Perforce is pretty efficient at only reading
what it needs rather than scanning the whole table these days (and with
2005.2 the mapstate improvement was made - see old conference papers on
server swamp for more info on this).

Doing reasonably regular clean ups of old clients etc is always a good idea.

Robert


More information about the perforce-user mailing list