[p4] Very big Perforce file : db.have
Robert Cowham
robert at vaccaperna.co.uk
Thu Aug 10 01:51:30 PDT 2006
> For best performance, it is a
> good thing if you have enough memory in your server that
> db.have can be held entirely in memory.
I would qualify this by saying that it is good to have enough memory to hold
the *active* part of db.have - Perforce is pretty efficient at only reading
what it needs rather than scanning the whole table these days (and with
2005.2 the mapstate improvement was made - see old conference papers on
server swamp for more info on this).
Doing reasonably regular clean ups of old clients etc is always a good idea.
Robert
More information about the perforce-user
mailing list