[p4] integrating when destination has been deleted
Ken.Williams@Thomson.com
Ken.Williams at Thomson.com
Wed Aug 30 07:08:52 PDT 2006
Maybe just remove those classes from the 1.1.0 branch spec?
-Ken
> -----Original Message-----
> From: perforce-user-bounces at perforce.com
> [mailto:perforce-user-bounces at perforce.com] On Behalf Of Rene Medellin
> Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 8:48 AM
> To: perforce-user at perforce.com
> Subject: [p4] integrating when destination has been deleted
>
> hi,
>
> i have the following scenario:
>
> 1) developer edits a class in //depot/project/1.0.0
> branch.
>
> 2) branches 1.1.0 and 1.2.0 exist downstream from
> 1.0.0
>
> 3) i have a night script that i run that iterates
> through the downstream branches looking for pending
> integrations. it sends a nice reminder to developers
> to deal with their integrations.
>
> 4) developer claims that the classes modified in 1.0.0
> have been already deleted in 1.1.0 and subsequent
> releases so they don't "need" to be integrated. i tell
> them that that may be so but when running 'p4
> integrate -b 1.1.0' p4's branch consistency check
> still requires those files be integrated forward (so
> to speak). after resolve, they can just delete them
> again.
>
> 5) developer grumbles that she'll need to continue to
> make changes to 1.0.0 for some time and that she'll
> have to keep doing this integrate-resolve-delete dance
> in all the downstream branches until 1.0.0 no longer
> needs to be maintained.
>
> any suggestions for how else to handle this?
>
> thanks,
>
> Rene Medellin
> marketaxess.com
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> perforce-user mailing list - perforce-user at perforce.com
> http://maillist.perforce.com/mailman/listinfo/perforce-user
>
>
More information about the perforce-user
mailing list