[p4] Changelist-at-a-time VS bulk integration

[Michael Graff]

I almost always do one-at-a-time merges.  It's much easier to isolate
problems.

On 12/8/06, Rick Macdonald <rickmacd at shaw.ca> wrote:
>
> The current thread about Cherry-picking reminds me that I never heard or
> thought about integrating one changelist at a time. I just do everything
> at once and hope for the best. Mostly it's fine. Things can get
> complicated, but it's always been doable.
>
> I first came across the one-at-a-time idea in Laura's book. I won't give
> an example; I'll assume folks here know what I'm referring to.
>
> Any comments about this? Does anybody do it always? Just when you think
> you might need to? Never?
>
> ...RickM...
> _______________________________________________
> perforce-user mailing list  -  perforce-user at perforce.com
> http://maillist.perforce.com/mailman/listinfo/perforce-user
>