[p4] Perforce and Bugzilla

[G. Matthew Rice]

"Bennett, Patrick" <Patrick.Bennett at inin.com> writes:
> Actually, Bugzilla isn't bad at all.  I've seen quite a few 'commercial'
> systems that have far few features (and don't provide source).

I never said it was bad.  I just said it wasn't that great :)

It does get the job done and I never fault anyone for using it.  Bugzilla
just isn't my preferred tool.

Regards,
Matthew (who needs to learn to bite his tongue more often)

> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: perforce-user-bounces at perforce.com 
> > [mailto:perforce-user-bounces at perforce.com] On Behalf Of Noah Salzman
> > Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 11:45 AM
> > To: G. Matthew Rice
> > Cc: perforce-user at perforce.com
> > Subject: Re: [p4] Perforce and Bugzilla
> > 
> > 
> > On Feb 9, 2006, at 7:38 AM, G. Matthew Rice wrote:
> > 
> > > That said, Bugzilla isn't that great of a defect tracker ;)
> > 
> > 
> > And, for the benefit of the list, the free defect tracking 
> > systems that have the same functionality of Bugzilla are?
> > 
> > (Not a Bugzilla bigot... just curious.)
> > _______________________________________________
> > perforce-user mailing list  -  perforce-user at perforce.com 
> > http://maillist.perforce.com/mailman/listinfo/perforce-user
> > 
> > 
> 

-- 
g. matthew rice <matt at starnix.com>           starnix, toronto, ontario, ca
phone: 647.722.5301 x242                                  gpg id: EF9AAD20
http://www.starnix.com              professional linux services & products