[p4] Perforce and Bugzilla
G. Matthew Rice
matt at starnix.com
Thu Feb 9 17:36:21 PST 2006
"Bennett, Patrick" <Patrick.Bennett at inin.com> writes:
> Actually, Bugzilla isn't bad at all. I've seen quite a few 'commercial'
> systems that have far few features (and don't provide source).
I never said it was bad. I just said it wasn't that great :)
It does get the job done and I never fault anyone for using it. Bugzilla
just isn't my preferred tool.
Matthew (who needs to learn to bite his tongue more often)
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: perforce-user-bounces at perforce.com
> > [mailto:perforce-user-bounces at perforce.com] On Behalf Of Noah Salzman
> > Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 11:45 AM
> > To: G. Matthew Rice
> > Cc: perforce-user at perforce.com
> > Subject: Re: [p4] Perforce and Bugzilla
> > On Feb 9, 2006, at 7:38 AM, G. Matthew Rice wrote:
> > > That said, Bugzilla isn't that great of a defect tracker ;)
> > And, for the benefit of the list, the free defect tracking
> > systems that have the same functionality of Bugzilla are?
> > (Not a Bugzilla bigot... just curious.)
> > _______________________________________________
> > perforce-user mailing list - perforce-user at perforce.com
> > http://maillist.perforce.com/mailman/listinfo/perforce-user
g. matthew rice <matt at starnix.com> starnix, toronto, ontario, ca
phone: 647.722.5301 x242 gpg id: EF9AAD20
http://www.starnix.com professional linux services & products
More information about the perforce-user