[p4] integrating when destination has been deleted

[Rene Medellin]

how or where do you vote? is the write-up for the
requested feature viewable somewhere? or just e-mail
support?

- Rene

--- Robert Cowham <robert at vaccaperna.co.uk> wrote:

> job000036 apparently for those who want to add their
> name to the list...
> 
> Robert 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Jones [mailto:drj at ravenbrook.com] 
> > Sent: 31 August 2006 16:10
> > To: Robert Cowham
> > Cc: 'Stephen Vance'; 'Weintraub, David';
> medellre at yahoo.com; 
> > perforce-user at perforce.com
> > Subject: Re: [p4] integrating when destination has
> been deleted
> > 
> > 
> > On 31 Aug 2006, at 13:33, Robert Cowham wrote:
> > 
> > >> Imagine if, rather than have a branch or delete
> just automatically 
> > >> apply, you had to resolve it and do an "accept
> theirs" or 
> > an "accept 
> > >> yours" such that from that point on you would
> not have to 
> > revisit the 
> > >> integration and you wouldn't have had to modify
> a branch spec.
> > >> Integrating an add with "accept theirs" would
> make the 
> > file present 
> > >> and with "accept yours" would have the file
> missing.
> > >> Integrating a delete would make the file
> missing with 
> > "accept theirs" 
> > >> and present with "accept yours".
> > >>
> > >> That is the way I believe it should behave,
> > >
> > > Yes, yes, yes - get's my vote!!
> > 
> > Mine too.
> > 
> > This could also naturally fix the perforce
> misfeature whereby 
> > fixes that have been applied to files on branches
> no longer 
> > get accounted for if the file is deleted on the
> branch then 
> > integed (back into the mainline for example).
> > 
> > drj
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com