[p4] Trying to sort out a protection issue - never mind...

[Jeff Grills]

Historically, I've been able to get as many non-human licenses from perforce
as I needed.  I did have to justify why existing non-human user licenses
were not sufficient for my needs, which usually was security related in some
fashion (access to particular parts of the depot, IP restrictions,
whatever).  They've never said "no" when I've had a compelling argument, and
I've never asked unless I had a compelling argument. YMMV.

j

> -----Original Message-----
> From: perforce-user-bounces at perforce.com 
> [mailto:perforce-user-bounces at perforce.com] On Behalf Of Ivey, William
> Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 10:14 AM
> To: perforce-user at perforce.com
> Subject: Re: [p4] Trying to sort out a protection issue - 
> never mind...
> 
> We already use ip-specific protections on several machines, 
> but in this case, I didn't want super granted to an ID on a 
> commonly available server machine.
> (Currently I have ip-specific review rights for some build 
> machines, and admin for the main server. Super hasn't really 
> been required anywhere, yet.)
> 
> I thought, the last time I looked, that Perforce was limiting 
> non-human licenses to two? (An extra license wouldn't solve 
> this issue for me, but there could be other situations.) 
> IIRC, that was a discussion here a year or so back?
> 
> -Wm