[p4] How well does perforce handle the disk being full?
Robert Cowham
robert at vaccaperna.co.uk
Tue Sep 11 14:29:15 PDT 2007
In principle I agree - you should always have sufficient disk space to have
second server able to run on the same machine.
This allows for a variety of scenarios:
- test upgrade on the live server of db.* files
- shorten time to copy files (can take o(hours) to copy 100+Gb db.* files on
a not so fast server)
I would tend to set up filesystems such that db.* and the versioned files
are on different systems, but that each system allows duplicates on your
main server (SAN architectures can make a difference)
Robert
> -----Original Message-----
> From: perforce-user-bounces at perforce.com
> [mailto:perforce-user-bounces at perforce.com] On Behalf Of
> Fredric.Fredriksson at mydata.se
> Sent: 11 September 2007 17:37
> To: perforce-user at perforce.com
> Subject: Re: [p4] How well does perforce handle the disk being full?
>
> I apologize for this half baked entry. I decided that it did
> not add much to the conversation and tried to discard it but
> I must have hit the send button by mistake.
> /Fredric Fredricson
>
> > I hava a policy to never use more than 45% of available
> disk space on
> > the server.
> > This way I can copy (backup) the entire depot if there is a problem
> > and I want to be able to fiddle around. (this has yet to happen,
> > though).
More information about the perforce-user
mailing list