[p4] The perforce-user mailing list
Michael Graff
michael.graff at pobox.com
Mon Apr 28 11:27:37 PDT 2008
In support of Robert's preference, with some history:
http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful.html
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 2:20 AM, Robert Cowham <robert at vaccaperna.co.uk>
wrote:
> Personally I like the current behaviour - the opposite means too many
> things
> go to the list which shouldn't.
>
> I think it keeps the noise ratio lower.
>
> Hey, it's just personal preference :)
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: perforce-user-bounces at perforce.com
> > [mailto:perforce-user-bounces at perforce.com] On Behalf Of Gabor Maghera
> > Sent: 19 April 2008 00:00
> > To: Evgeny
> > Cc: perforce-user at perforce.com
> > Subject: Re: [p4] The perforce-user mailing list
> >
> > I'll second that. I've had to send some of my messages
> > twice, 'cause I used reply on the first try.
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Evgeny
> > <evgeny.zislis at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > It's annoying to hit "reply-to-all" each time I want to
> > reply to this
> > > mailing list, can't someone turn on the option "Reply-to:
> > > perforce-users at perforce.com" ?
> > >
> > > Please!
>
>
More information about the perforce-user
mailing list