[p4] Finding the workspace name: is p4config mandatory?
Steve M. Robbins
steve at sumost.ca
Fri Feb 22 15:06:39 PST 2008
I should clarify a few things.
1) It is perfectly possible to use p4v without setting anything in
the environment. Not the workspace, not P4PORT, not even P4CONFIG.
This is how we operate today.
2) We typically want developers to be able to build on their machine.
3) The developer build is set off outside of p4v: from an IDE, or
command line "make", etc.
Item #2 implies that I don't just have a problem of setting up 1
p4config file for N workspaces on a build server, but an NxM problem
where M is the number of developers. (Alternatively, each developer
has to set up N config files.)
Granted, this can be done. It's not rocket science. But it gives you
NxM chances to make a mistake while setting up something that should
be mechanically generated (as is done by both CVS and Subversion).
When I get to a point like this I figure either I'm abusing the tool,
or the the tool is too limited.
So what you folks using p4v with large M do?
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 09:43:24AM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> A recent thread on this list concerns adding a changelist number to
> C++ code, to which Robert Cowham responded with a suggestion to run a
> couple of p4 commands in the root of the workspace . This is easy
> to script, but it assumes that the workspace name is available to the
> As a build manager, I would prefer to write one script to be used by
> all developers. Each developer has their own workspace, so the
> workspace name cannot be embedded in the script. Therefore it seems
> that the script has to obtain it from the environment. So either you
> have to have it set in the environment (but then who uses just one
> client?) or you have to have a p4config file properly set up.
> Is that the case -- or is there another possibility that I'm
> overlooking? Is p4config therefore mandatory even for a shop that
> otherwise uses p4v exclusively?
> Now, if p4config is mandatory, is there a way to generate them
> automatically? I have been crafting each of mine by hand, which is
> a real nuisance. It strikes me that the first "p4 sync" could write
> the config file for me.
>  http://maillist.perforce.com/pipermail/perforce-user/2008-February/023342.html
> perforce-user mailing list - perforce-user at perforce.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the perforce-user